Curriculum as Place

To start, I think it is important to define reinhabitation and decolonization. Reinhabitation, as defined in the article is “identifying, recovering, and creating material spaces and places that will teach people how to live well in their environments” (Restoule, Gruner, & Metatawabin, 2013, p. 74). Decolonization means to “identify and change ways of thinking that injure and exploit other people and places” (Restoule et al, 2013, p.74).

This pertains to Indigenous peoples because a lot of the Indigenous peoples’ culture was taken away from them through colonization. Furthermore, certain Indigenous groups have gone extinct, such as the Beothuk. As a result, the Indigenous peoples are in a state of confusion on who they are. We, the dominant European culture, cannot tell them what their identity is. So, the Indigenous peoples have to use what little bits and pieces they can find to recreate their culture and identity. In the article, there is research being done on the importance of the land/territory and how one can learn from it. This shows that one does not have to learn only inside of a classroom, their surroundings will also tell them information. They can also go out into the environment to learn life skills. For example, what plants can and cannot be used as medicine. A specific landmark that the Mushkegowuk people place a lot of importance on the river. The river has meaning through the social, cultural, economic, and spiritual among the community members. They relied on the river. For example, they got food, hydration, and travel from the river. The river is a big of their identity and should not be forgotten. Additionally, the interviews that are recorded in the article are a way for Indigenous peoples to reintegrate their oral traditions into their and our culture. The use of story is a completely different teaching method than the European culture uses where a student has to sit in a classroom for seven hours and absorb and recite information that has been taught to them. I believe that by using their traditional teaching methods, the Indigenous peoples will start to get more of their culture back which is a perfect example of reinhabitation and decolonization because the Mushkegowuk are in the process of self-discovery and change.

During my school experience, there was not a lot of importance placed on the land. Almost all of our learning happened inside of the classroom. If we did leave the classroom to go on a field trip, it was rarely educational but more so just for fun at the end of the year/semester. For example, sometimes we would go to wave pool and get pizza afterwards, on a ski trip, our school even had a travel club. We did not have a relationship with the land. We saw the land as something that has valuable resources that we can take without asking. Since my relationship with the land is not the greatest, I believe it would be beneficial to bring in a local Elder to help my class see that we can learn from everything around us instead of only in the school building.

Furthermore, in my own teaching, I will have to recognize that the European viewpoint is not the best viewpoint and I will need to break away from traditional European ways of teaching. I will have to make sure that different worldviews are identified and explored. As mentioned previously, it may be beneficial to bring an Elder into the classroom or go on more meaningful field trips. Nowadays, there is a lot of stress put onto teaching Indigenous viewpoints. I am not saying that this is a negative thing because there will most definitely be a high percentage of Indigenous students in my classroom and they play a big part in Canada’s development. However, I do not want my students who may be immigrants or refugees to feel ostracized in the classroom either. I believe a good way for students to display their culture’s traditions and viewpoints to their peers, is to do a “Canadian Identity Project.” I completed a similar project in my senior year of high school. We wrote an essay and then made our essays into videos which we showed to the class. This project was beneficial because my class has never been separated since kindergarten (I attended a K-12 school). We all knew each other fairly well, but after this project, we all felt even closer and that we understood each other better. In other words, in my teaching, I want to create a sense of community in my classroom. The definition of community is “a group of people living in the same place or having a particular characteristic in common” (“Community,” 2019). Everyone in my future class is going to be different, and that is what makes us all the same. I want everyone to feel that they are valued members of the group and should not be afraid to show off who they are.

Reference

Community. (2019). In English Oxford Living Dictionaries. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/community

Restoule, J.P., Gruner, S., & Metatawabin, E. (2013). Learning from Place: A Return to Traditional Mushkegowuk Ways of Knowing. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dI7wj8JcsOuMVHjWx1aKJy3XzCSoyYuc/view

6 thoughts on “Curriculum as Place

  1. I think what you mention about having a dialogue in your class where all viewpoints can be talked about is important. There will be many different represented cultures in all our classes and they all hold value. I do think Indiginous perspectives are important based on our location and Canadian history, but it’s important to not become so focused we lose sight of the voices in our room.

    Like

  2. Hi Allica,
    I also did the Canadian Identity project and I found that it help show the diversity within the classroom. Within this reading the river plays a big part in the community, do you have any assignments that would relate to the river?
    Thanks for sharing!

    Like

  3. Hi Allicia,
    I do agree that it as part of the dominant European culture it is going to be hard as a teacher to break away from traditional European teachings, but that it is a necessity to observe and practice other ways of teaching as well. I suppose my only question is how do you plan to teach from all these different viewpoints? From culture to culture there are many different ways of learning and teaching so how do you think we as educators can include this in our short school year? Do you think it is possible?
    Thanks again for your response it gave me a lot to think about!
    -Jessalyn

    Like

  4. Hey Allicia, I appreciate what you said about how we don’t have to learn everything in a classroom. I think too often, teachers feel this is the most efficient way of teaching/learning but this isn’t always the case.

    Like

  5. Hello!
    I really liked how you related this reading to immigrant students coming into the classroom and how they may feel when entering a classroom that may or may not look like the ones they are accustomed to. I learned about the effects that has on children in my ECE 325 class this semester and that is why it is so important to challenge “common sense” in school.
    Well written blog post.

    Like

  6. Creating a comfortable space where all your students feel safe enough to share their viewpoints is a great idea. Addressing every culture and incorporating them into your classroom is so important!
    Thanks for sharing!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s